Accessible Transportation for Persons with Disabilities Regulations – an outline – Lexology

Accessible Transportation for Persons with Disabilities Regulations - an overview - Lexology

Accessible Transportation for Persons with Disabilities Regulations - an outline - Lexology 1Introduction

In 2019 the Canadian federal authorities took steps to handle boundaries for individuals with disabilities, together with the introduction of the Accessible Canada Act. The acknowledged aim is to make Canada barrier free by 2040. The laws and associated laws goal federal companies and federally regulated industries, together with aviation.

The Accessible Transportation for Persons with Disabilities Regulations (ATPDR) have been finalised and revealed in July 2019 as a part of the Canadian Transportation Agency’s Regulatory Modernisation Initiative, which launched in 2016.(1)

The ATPDR addresses federally regulated transportation members not solely in aviation, but additionally rail, marine and interprovincial bus transportation and applies to carriers, airports and terminal operators and the Canada Border Services Agency, amongst others.

Most of the provisions below the ATPDR will come into drive on 25 June 2020, together with the service necessities relevant to carriers (Part 2 of the ATPDR). Part 2 is the one provision that applies to overseas carriers – Canadian carriers have extra obligations that they have to meet below the ATPDR.

For the time being, solely ‘massive’ carriers are topic to necessities below the ATPDR, which has a distinct definition of a ‘massive’ service than the Air Passenger Protection Regulations (APPR). Under the ATPDR, a ‘massive’ service is a service which has transported a million passengers or extra in every of the earlier two calendar years. Under the APPR, the cut-off is 2 million passengers.

Part 2 of the ATPDR includes Sections 24 to 62 thereof. Among other forms of service, this half applies to:

each massive air service that gives a service for the transportation of passengers

1. between factors inside Canada;

2. from a degree of origin in Canada to some extent of vacation spot in another country, or

3. from a degree of origin in another country to some extent of vacation spot in Canada.

As a normal rule, carriers should present the assorted providers set out in Part 2 of the ATPDR the place a passenger requests them not less than 48 hours prematurely of their scheduled departure. However, carriers should present some providers even when the request is made lower than 48 hours pre-departure, together with wheelchair providers.

In addition, if a request for a service is obtained lower than 96 hours (4 days) previous to departure, the service informs the passenger that additional data or documentation is required to permit it to evaluate the request and the required data isn’t supplied greater than 48 hours previous to departure, strictly talking, the service isn’t required to supply the service.

However, Section 32(4) of the ATPDR offers that carriers should make an inexpensive effort to supply any service requested by a passenger with a incapacity irrespective of when it’s obtained.


Section 54 of the ATPDR offers that the place a passenger with a incapacity identifies the character of their incapacity when making a reservation, the service should interact in a dialogue to establish the passenger’s wants and focus on the providers out there to them.

In addition, the place the character of a incapacity is recognized, the service should inform the passenger of the seats out there within the class of service that they’ve requested which could greatest meet their accessibility wants (eg, a passenger seat that has extra leg room, a bigger seat pitch or movable armrests). When assigning a seat, Section 55(2) of the ATPDR requires carriers to have in mind the passenger’s opinion as to which seat would greatest meet their accessibility wants.

Section 58 of the ATPDR requires carriers to point of their reservation system the providers that they’ll present to disabled passengers and “embody a written affirmation of the providers within the itinerary that’s issued to the individual”. If the service is confirmed after the issuance of the itinerary, a written affirmation of the service should be supplied to the passenger. The purpose is for carriers to maintain a report of such providers and supply passengers with optimistic proof that such providers have been supplied.

Several carriers have expressed concern over Section 59 of the ATPDR, which requires carriers to supply to maintain an digital report of knowledge (together with private well being data) that an individual with a incapacity offers in relation to a request for a service below Part 2 for not less than three years. The purpose of this provision is to have carriers retain paperwork comparable to medical notes or certificates that may be wanted as proof to supply disability-related providers, in order that passengers needn’t submit mentioned data every time a request for a service is made.

Some carriers have indicated that they don’t have the capability to retain such data at present and, extra importantly, that doing so might violate varied US legal guidelines defending the privateness of a person’s well being and medical data.

Section 33 of the ATPDR offers that carriers could require passengers who request any of the providers addressed in Part 2 (there are exceptions) to supply “any data or paperwork, together with a medical certificates, which can be fairly mandatory to allow the service to evaluate the individual’s request”.

Priority boarding

Section 34 of the ATPDR requires carriers to permit individuals with disabilities to board prematurely of different passengers in the event that they request help with:

It additionally requires that precedence boarding be supplied to passengers who’re blind or have one other visible impairment and who request help.

Priority boarding should even be supplied on request to passengers who are suffering from extreme allergy symptoms and have requested that their seat be cleaned to take away any potential allergens. A ‘extreme allergy’ is outlined in Part 2 of the ATPDR as “an allergy to an allergen which will trigger an individual to expertise vital bodily misery if they’re immediately uncovered to the allergen”.

Other help and providers on request

Section 35 of the ATPDR units out a protracted checklist of the forms of help that carriers should present if requested by an individual with a incapacity, together with:

Wheelchair providers

In addition to the requirement to supply wheelchair providers – normally via a wheelchair service supplier – the ATPDR requires that if an individual with a incapacity who makes use of a wheelchair or different machine and isn’t independently cellular is ready post-check in for departure or a connecting flight, the service should be certain that the passenger is supplied a spot to attend that’s near the brokers – both of the service or a wheelchair service supplier – out there to supply help. Sections 37 and 38 additionally require that members of personnel periodically enquire in regards to the passenger’s wants.

Transportation of mobility help and different assistive units

Section 40 of the ATPDR requires that carriers settle for mobility aids as precedence baggage and permits passengers who require a mobility help to retain them till they have to be saved for carriage.

However, carriers could refuse to hold mobility aids if:

If the transport of a mobility help is refused, the service should clarify why in writing inside 10 days.

Carriers should make room to move mobility aids by:

However, the place a mobility help requires disassembly, the service could require the passenger to supply written directions for disassembly and reassembly and arrive on the airport prematurely of the conventional scheduled check-in time.

Section 49 of the ATPDR requires carriers to permit individuals with disabilities to deliver on board smaller assistive units which they require throughout journey (eg, canes, crutches, communication units and transportable oxygen concentrators).

Transportation of help individuals

Where somebody with a incapacity requires a help individual, carriers should settle for and seat them in a seat adjoining to the individual with a incapacity. A help individual is somebody who helps a disabled individual with:

As with different providers coated by Part 2 of the ATPDR, Canadian carriers offering home providers could not cost a fare or a further payment to move a help individual. However, this prohibition doesn’t apply to worldwide service – so a overseas service can cost a fare or payment to move a help individual required by an individual with a incapacity.

Transportation of service canines

Service canines should be accepted for journey the place an individual with a incapacity must journey with them. Carriers could require individuals who make requests to journey with a service canine to:

Carriers flying between Canada and different international locations could cost a payment for the supply of this service.

Additional seat

Where an individual with a incapacity wants a couple of seat due to the character of their incapacity, the service should present two seats adjoining to at least one one other. Again, carriers flying between overseas international locations and Canada could cost the passenger for the additional seat; the company has not prolonged the one-person-one-fare rule to worldwide carriage.

Allergy buffer zone

For individuals with a incapacity because of a extreme allergy, carriers should present on request a buffer zone across the passenger’s seat to cut back danger of publicity to the allergen. Specifically, the service should present the individual with a seat in a financial institution of seats “aside from the financial institution of seats by which the supply of the allergen is situated and aside from the financial institution of seats dealing with that financial institution of seats”. A financial institution of seats doesn’t embody seats throughout the aisle.

In addition, Section 53 of the ATPDR requires carriers to tell passengers sitting in the identical financial institution of seats because the individual with the allergy that there’s a passenger with a extreme allergy current and with particulars of the particular allergen.


(1) Accessible Transportation for Persons with Disabilities Regulations, SOR/2019-244.

Source hyperlink